(no subject)
May. 20th, 2008 04:23 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
mechante_filleI know I don't know the whole story, but this woman just seems unbelievable.
To come to court and basically say, 'I was only in it for the money,' just seems counter to what you'd want to present to the judge. Or is that just me? I suppose she would need to maybe come up with some kind of defence mechanism to the public humiliation of her husband having any affair.
Actually, a gay affair might actually paint one in a better light. 'See, it wasn't me; I was just the wrong gender.' Which, I guess, is why she is crying fraud. And demanding $51,000 a month.
Regardless, though, I'm not sure that I could have done the whole, 'stand by my man' thing in the press conferences. What exactly does it even accomplish? I see that and think, 'political move,' not 'oh, I guess I can forgive him if she can.' Yeah, whatever.
Eh, for both their sakes, I just hope it ends soon, and they can move on with their lives. Without $51,000 a month.
To come to court and basically say, 'I was only in it for the money,' just seems counter to what you'd want to present to the judge. Or is that just me? I suppose she would need to maybe come up with some kind of defence mechanism to the public humiliation of her husband having any affair.
Actually, a gay affair might actually paint one in a better light. 'See, it wasn't me; I was just the wrong gender.' Which, I guess, is why she is crying fraud. And demanding $51,000 a month.
Regardless, though, I'm not sure that I could have done the whole, 'stand by my man' thing in the press conferences. What exactly does it even accomplish? I see that and think, 'political move,' not 'oh, I guess I can forgive him if she can.' Yeah, whatever.
Eh, for both their sakes, I just hope it ends soon, and they can move on with their lives. Without $51,000 a month.